Difference between revisions of "Observe"

From SatNOGS Wiki
(re-categorize good/bad unknowns)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Introduction ==
 
== Introduction ==
  
Below are examples of SatNOGS observations that can be used to help rating new observations as "Good", "Bad", or "Failed".
+
Below are examples of waterfalls from SatNOGS Network observations that can be used to help vetting new waterfalls as "With Signal" or "Without Signal".
  
  
 
Click right and left arrows at top of image to view next image.
 
Click right and left arrows at top of image to view next image.
  
== Good Observations ==
+
== Waterfalls with signal ==
  
These waterfalls are good observations.
+
These waterfalls should be vetted as "With Signal".
  
 
<gallery mode="slideshow" showthumbnails>
 
<gallery mode="slideshow" showthumbnails>
Line 56: Line 56:
 
File:Waterfall_1524071_2020-01-11T09-27-29.png|Observation 1524071
 
File:Waterfall_1524071_2020-01-11T09-27-29.png|Observation 1524071
 
File:Waterfall_1524066_2020-01-11T08-59-57.png|Observation 1524066
 
File:Waterfall_1524066_2020-01-11T08-59-57.png|Observation 1524066
 +
File:Waterfall_1525136_2020-01-11T15-58-19.png|Observation 1525136, with noise
 +
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
  
== Bad Observations ==
+
== Waterfalls without signal ==
  
These waterfalls show bad observations.
+
These waterfalls should be vetted as "Without Signal".
  
 
<gallery mode="slideshow" showthumbnails>
 
<gallery mode="slideshow" showthumbnails>
Line 74: Line 76:
 
File:Waterfall_1523768_2020-01-11T07-42-00.png|Observation 1523768
 
File:Waterfall_1523768_2020-01-11T07-42-00.png|Observation 1523768
 
File:Waterfall_1523488_2020-01-11T06-41-14.png|Observation 1523488
 
File:Waterfall_1523488_2020-01-11T06-41-14.png|Observation 1523488
</gallery>
 
 
== Failed Observations ==
 
 
These waterfalls show failed observations.
 
 
<gallery mode="slideshow" showthumbnails>
 
File:Waterfall_1365407_2019-12-13T02-15-35.png|SatNOGS Client uploaded an image, but it is a solid color.
 
</gallery>
 
 
== Observations to Confirm ==
 
The below observations are corner cases or more difficult to discern than the above examples. As the below examples are confirmed by more experienced members of the community, they can be moved to their appropriate classification above.
 
 
=== Possibly Bad Observations ===
 
The below observations are potentially "bad" observations.
 
 
<gallery mode="slideshow" showthumbnails>
 
 
File:Waterfall_1524535_2020-01-11T11-13-50.png|Observation 1524535
 
File:Waterfall_1524535_2020-01-11T11-13-50.png|Observation 1524535
 
File:Waterfall_1525047_2020-01-11T15-32-14.png|Observation 1525047
 
File:Waterfall_1525047_2020-01-11T15-32-14.png|Observation 1525047
Line 106: Line 91:
 
File:Waterfall_1523690_2020-01-11T07-08-44.png|Observation 1523690
 
File:Waterfall_1523690_2020-01-11T07-08-44.png|Observation 1523690
 
File:Waterfall_1523562_2020-01-11T07-10-27.png|Observation 1523562
 
File:Waterfall_1523562_2020-01-11T07-10-27.png|Observation 1523562
</gallery>
+
File:Waterfall_1365407_2019-12-13T02-15-35.png|SatNOGS Client uploaded an image, but it is a solid color.
 
 
=== Possibly Failed Observations ===
 
The below observations are potentially "failed" observations.
 
 
 
<gallery mode="slideshow" showthumbnails>
 
File:Waterfall_1525136_2020-01-11T15-58-19.png|Observation 1525136
 
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
  

Latest revision as of 12:28, 21 August 2020

Introduction

Below are examples of waterfalls from SatNOGS Network observations that can be used to help vetting new waterfalls as "With Signal" or "Without Signal".


Click right and left arrows at top of image to view next image.

Waterfalls with signal

These waterfalls should be vetted as "With Signal".

Waterfalls without signal

These waterfalls should be vetted as "Without Signal".

See also