Difference between revisions of "Observe"
(Add stub categories for rated, but not double-checked observations) |
(Move 1484539 to possibly maybe failed) |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
<gallery mode="slideshow"> | <gallery mode="slideshow"> | ||
File:Waterfall_1365407_2019-12-13T02-15-35.png|thumb|center|Observation 1365407 | File:Waterfall_1365407_2019-12-13T02-15-35.png|thumb|center|Observation 1365407 | ||
− | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Line 57: | Line 56: | ||
=== Possibly Failed Observations === | === Possibly Failed Observations === | ||
The below observations are potentially "failed" observations. | The below observations are potentially "failed" observations. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <gallery mode="slideshow"> | ||
+ | File:Waterfall_1484539_2020-01-03T13-22-00.png|thumb|center|Observation 1484539 | ||
+ | </gallery> |
Revision as of 17:57, 11 January 2020
Contents
Rating Observations
Below are examples of SatNOGS observations that can be used to help rating new observations as "Good", "Bad", or "Failed".
Click right at left arrows at top of image to view next image. Clicking the center image icon at top will make a gallery of thumbnails below the main image.
Good Observations
These waterfalls are good observations.
Bad Observations
These waterfalls show bad observations.
Failed Observations
These waterfalls show failed observations.
Observations to Confirm
The below observations are corner cases or possibly difficult to discern than the above examples. As the below examples are confirmed by more experienced members of the community, they can be moved to their appropriate classification above.
Possibly Good Observations
The below observations are potentially "good" observations.
Possibly Bad Observations
The below observations are potentially "bad" observations.
Possibly Failed Observations
The below observations are potentially "failed" observations.